<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links for 07-02-2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/links-for-07-02-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/links-for-07-02-2007/</link>
	<description>Science fiction, science fact, and all that's in between ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:23:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Raven</title>
		<link>http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/links-for-07-02-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-22685</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 01:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/links-for-2007-02-07/#comment-22685</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;(assuming they digitise books at their current rate)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Very true, but this is a snowball situation, and that current rate won&#039;t stay at the level it is now; they&#039;re going slowly at the moment because the legal shenanigans are still being worked out. Once they know they&#039;re safe, they&#039;ll throw a great deal of money and resources at it. Google are canny players, they know exactly what they&#039;re doing - and there&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/news/web/the-race-to-digitise-the-worlds-literature/2006/11/11/1162661941580.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a new conglomerate&lt;/a&gt; trying to sideswipe with the same idea. For better or for worse, it&#039;s not a case of &#039;if&#039; but &#039;when&#039;, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>(assuming they digitise books at their current rate)</p></blockquote>
<p>Very true, but this is a snowball situation, and that current rate won&#8217;t stay at the level it is now; they&#8217;re going slowly at the moment because the legal shenanigans are still being worked out. Once they know they&#8217;re safe, they&#8217;ll throw a great deal of money and resources at it. Google are canny players, they know exactly what they&#8217;re doing &#8211; and there&#8217;s <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/news/web/the-race-to-digitise-the-worlds-literature/2006/11/11/1162661941580.html" rel="nofollow">a new conglomerate</a> trying to sideswipe with the same idea. For better or for worse, it&#8217;s not a case of &#8216;if&#8217; but &#8216;when&#8217;, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/links-for-07-02-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-22641</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/links-for-2007-02-07/#comment-22641</guid>
		<description>I read with interest your link about Google books and Princeton. I remain unimpressed. Did you know that (assuming they digitise books at their current rate) it will take Google 200 years to digitise the current sum of knowledge? I cite as my source http://www.degreetutor.com/library/adult-continued-education/librarians-needed 
By the way, hope you got the job!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read with interest your link about Google books and Princeton. I remain unimpressed. Did you know that (assuming they digitise books at their current rate) it will take Google 200 years to digitise the current sum of knowledge? I cite as my source <a href="http://www.degreetutor.com/library/adult-continued-education/librarians-needed" rel="nofollow">http://www.degreetutor.com/library/adult-continued-education/librarians-needed</a><br />
By the way, hope you got the job!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
