<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Literary populism &#8211; my &#8216;soul of arrogance&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/literary-populism-my-soul-of-arrogance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/literary-populism-my-soul-of-arrogance/</link>
	<description>Science fiction, science fact, and all that's in between ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 02:49:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/literary-populism-my-soul-of-arrogance/comment-page-1/#comment-60702</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 21:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/literary-populism-my-soul-of-arrogance/#comment-60702</guid>
		<description>In case anyone did not see my apology on my site, here is it again: the good Mr. Raven was writing about mocking someone because he hadn&#039;t read a certain great book. He is correct that such behavior is cruel and petty--certainly no one ever enjoyed a book because someone shamed him into it. I reacted as if he were saying something much stronger: that there was no difference between great books and good ones, or, worse, that holding up some books as great is merely a pretense, and inflated self-opinion.

While that might have been in interesting discussion to have, what actually happened is that he said something quite reasonable, and I went off half-cocked. I suppose it must be the thin air up here on top of the mountains of literary greatness. Now, if you&#039;ll excuse me, I am taking myself and my elevated tastes out to see a Spiderman movie. 

(The phrase the judgment of Paris is a classical allusion. There was a shepherd boy who had to judge between three beautiful goddesses, the Nina, the Pinta, and the Santa Maria, and his choice so outraged the great mother goddess Hera, the wife of the great father god Him-a, that the Nazis took Paris without shelling the city. Paris was drunk at the time, or, as we say, plastered. This is were we get our word for Plaster of Paris, which we still use to this day.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case anyone did not see my apology on my site, here is it again: the good Mr. Raven was writing about mocking someone because he hadn&#8217;t read a certain great book. He is correct that such behavior is cruel and petty&#8211;certainly no one ever enjoyed a book because someone shamed him into it. I reacted as if he were saying something much stronger: that there was no difference between great books and good ones, or, worse, that holding up some books as great is merely a pretense, and inflated self-opinion.</p>
<p>While that might have been in interesting discussion to have, what actually happened is that he said something quite reasonable, and I went off half-cocked. I suppose it must be the thin air up here on top of the mountains of literary greatness. Now, if you&#8217;ll excuse me, I am taking myself and my elevated tastes out to see a Spiderman movie. </p>
<p>(The phrase the judgment of Paris is a classical allusion. There was a shepherd boy who had to judge between three beautiful goddesses, the Nina, the Pinta, and the Santa Maria, and his choice so outraged the great mother goddess Hera, the wife of the great father god Him-a, that the Nazis took Paris without shelling the city. Paris was drunk at the time, or, as we say, plastered. This is were we get our word for Plaster of Paris, which we still use to this day.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: There's No Time Like The Present &#171; The Entropy Pump</title>
		<link>http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/literary-populism-my-soul-of-arrogance/comment-page-1/#comment-60303</link>
		<dc:creator>There's No Time Like The Present &#171; The Entropy Pump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 11:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/literary-populism-my-soul-of-arrogance/#comment-60303</guid>
		<description>[...] May 10th, 2007 in Uncategorized    Elitists are humble. So are mountaineers. Old meme never die.       [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] May 10th, 2007 in Uncategorized    Elitists are humble. So are mountaineers. Old meme never die.       [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Camden</title>
		<link>http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/literary-populism-my-soul-of-arrogance/comment-page-1/#comment-60172</link>
		<dc:creator>Sterling Camden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 23:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/literary-populism-my-soul-of-arrogance/#comment-60172</guid>
		<description>Ha.  It&#039;s all well and good to admire great literature and set standards for yourself, but his presuppositon that those standards are absolute defeats his whole argument, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha.  It&#8217;s all well and good to admire great literature and set standards for yourself, but his presuppositon that those standards are absolute defeats his whole argument, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.velcro-city.co.uk/literary-populism-my-soul-of-arrogance/feed/ ) in 0.19785 seconds, on Feb 13th, 2012 at 12:19 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 13th, 2012 at 1:19 am UTC -->
