<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science fiction and pornography, the myth of critical objectivity and anonymised reviewing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/science-fiction-and-pornography-the-myth-of-critical-objectivity-and-anonymised-reviewing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/science-fiction-and-pornography-the-myth-of-critical-objectivity-and-anonymised-reviewing/</link>
	<description>Science fiction, science fact, and all that's in between ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 02:49:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Palmer</title>
		<link>http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/science-fiction-and-pornography-the-myth-of-critical-objectivity-and-anonymised-reviewing/comment-page-1/#comment-162367</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/?p=2976#comment-162367</guid>
		<description>When I worked as a script reader in theatre, there was a rumour that an early Harold Pinter stage play was being circulated among literary managers, to flush out the ones who couldn&#039;t tell good from bad...sneaky huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I worked as a script reader in theatre, there was a rumour that an early Harold Pinter stage play was being circulated among literary managers, to flush out the ones who couldn&#8217;t tell good from bad&#8230;sneaky huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Raven</title>
		<link>http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/science-fiction-and-pornography-the-myth-of-critical-objectivity-and-anonymised-reviewing/comment-page-1/#comment-161543</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/?p=2976#comment-161543</guid>
		<description>Jona: I think most critics know that, yes. Less authors, though, and even fewer readers, whence arises the &lt;em&gt;angst&lt;/em&gt;. :)

Casey: no worries, and sorry about the androgyny - I couldn&#039;t find an &#039;about&#039; page for you! Looking forward to reading more of your stuff. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jona: I think most critics know that, yes. Less authors, though, and even fewer readers, whence arises the <em>angst</em>. <img src='http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Casey: no worries, and sorry about the androgyny &#8211; I couldn&#8217;t find an &#8216;about&#8217; page for you! Looking forward to reading more of your stuff. <img src='http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Samulski</title>
		<link>http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/science-fiction-and-pornography-the-myth-of-critical-objectivity-and-anonymised-reviewing/comment-page-1/#comment-161539</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Samulski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/?p=2976#comment-161539</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the love!

For future reference, I am a male. I often forget the gift/curse that is an androgynous first name on these vast internets and the confusion it can cause.

I really like how you phrased your conclusion. I think objectivity in criticism is a myth, like you say, but that doesn&#039;t mean that we can&#039;t embrace subjectivity as a useful litmus anyways.

If a particular critic is known for spitting venom and ashes upon everything New Weird he encounters but grudgingly gives Mi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the love!</p>
<p>For future reference, I am a male. I often forget the gift/curse that is an androgynous first name on these vast internets and the confusion it can cause.</p>
<p>I really like how you phrased your conclusion. I think objectivity in criticism is a myth, like you say, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that we can&#8217;t embrace subjectivity as a useful litmus anyways.</p>
<p>If a particular critic is known for spitting venom and ashes upon everything New Weird he encounters but grudgingly gives Mi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan M</title>
		<link>http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/science-fiction-and-pornography-the-myth-of-critical-objectivity-and-anonymised-reviewing/comment-page-1/#comment-161500</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.velcro-city.co.uk/?p=2976#comment-161500</guid>
		<description>Nice piece.

But I think it is understood that criticism is subjective.  I think arguing your corner in a review is not about making your work more authoritative, it&#039;s about showing your working.  Allowing your audience to work out why you stand where you do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice piece.</p>
<p>But I think it is understood that criticism is subjective.  I think arguing your corner in a review is not about making your work more authoritative, it&#8217;s about showing your working.  Allowing your audience to work out why you stand where you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.velcro-city.co.uk/science-fiction-and-pornography-the-myth-of-critical-objectivity-and-anonymised-reviewing/feed/ ) in 0.19671 seconds, on Feb 13th, 2012 at 1:09 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 13th, 2012 at 2:09 am UTC -->
