Comments on: Why bad book reviews can be a good thing

By: Bill

Bill — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:47:57 +0000

I think the more renowned a reviewer is the more tolerant most readers would be of the egotism they might inject into a piece. If it’s Norman Mailer reviewing for the New York Times or something on that level, I think the egotism is almost expected.

By: Paul Raven

Paul Raven — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:49:50 +0000

Is that a promise or a threat, Jetse?

By: Jetse

Jetse — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:12:31 +0000

There will be review blogging, soon.

You have been warned!

By: Jonathan M

Jonathan M — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:02:41 +0000

That is a fine name. Much better than “Urban Drift”

Good post too. Nicely distills a lot of the Taverna’s thinking.

By: Niall

Niall — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:41:05 +0000